tristanrenaud’s posterous

tristanrenaud’s posterous

Tristan Renaud  //  It does not mean burning investors' cash and pretending you are changing the world like nobody before.

Web business is like any business, serving clients, a skilled and motivated team and creating value to your shareholders.

And that's what I like.

Disclosure: I am acting as Vice President at Jahia (www.jahia.com). This blog does not reflect the position of my employer but my own thoughts about this market.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Nov 18 / 9:39am

Software pricing: to hide or not to hide? That is the question – Or have the Bazaar's Principles become obsolete?

Software vendors don’t like so much publishing their prices on the web site. They will explain they have a very complex price list, or can be very creative justifying why they can’t. But to make a long story short: they just don’t want to. I don’t see the value for the client to hide the price. And that’s exactly why they don’t like to show it.

I can’t say there is a significant wind of change, but these days, several people have been arguing that Commercial Open Source Software (COSS), at least should publish their pricing.

Anyone who spent some times in countries located into the Middle East knows there is no price written in the bazaar. (By the way, it is funny to read into Wikipedia that “The word derives from the Persian word bāzār, the etymology of which goes back to the Middle Persian word baha-char (بهاچار), and meaning "the place of prices"”. Ironic, isn’t it?). And business is business so what works for Bazaar works also for other businesses, and, more important, that's where business was invented, a long time ago.

 

First Bazaar's Principle

As usual, the vendor is doing is best to sell to the buyer the highest price possible. Of course no vendor will admit it, but that’s basically the reason why you don’t have prices available. Hiding the pricing helps a lot. It is really a great rule; everybody will pay its “custom” price. That’s great. The more you are ready to pay, the better the margin will be for the vendor and the buyer will just pay the price he decided to pay. Everybody’s happy. You usually learn that basic principle during your very first year of sales, wherever you work.

 

Second Bazaar's Principle

There is another (excellent) reason: people are not logic, they have emotions. They can be influenced. So they can change their mind and can adapt their budget accordingly. First you attract them, and then you try to convince them. Some people may not be interested into an expensive product first, and then would change their mind finding it finally to be the perfect match for their project.

 

But is it the perfect business model?

There is no perfect business model, by definition. But there is a basic principle into business: you have to be consistent if you want to be understood and to convince, it helps to be understood. As I am too a believer there is no “open source companies” but only open source projects, I would not say COSS need to publish their prices. That said, transparency is a key value of open source, so it is very consistent to publish the prices for that reason. That’s also why people will be looking for with COSS. Some will say there can be no transparency in business, fair enough, but at least there can be some transparency in the public price, which is already a lot.

Further more, I hate losing my time, like everyone, but as a COSS vendor, I am supposed to be more competitive too. COSS are supposed to be cost-killing solutions. So I cannot afford losing my time, and that’s a fact, sales model of COSS pretend to be more effective (Optaros’ white paper, page 6). For one client who will change his mind on his budget (assuming he not only wants but also can), how many will just knock at the wrong door, dreaming of a software too expensive for their budget? The second principle of the Bazaar is not consistent with the COSS argument of having more competitive sales.

 

So why does a vendor publish his pricing?

Because he believes it is a commercial advantage.

Publishing prices means renouncing to the Bazaar's Principles. It means something; it is not just a detail. So don’t expect high discounts with the vendors (otherwise they would be fool publishing too high prices), but expect them to believe in transparency and openness. Like in any business, you can ask for discounts if you are ready to buy something unusual (volume, volume, volume - mainly), but, obviously, you cannot ask simultaneously transparency and high discounts. As you know the price since day one, it is consistent.

We are almost in 2010, the software industry is a worldwide vibrant B2B business, so maybe it is time to renounce, for good reasons, to the so old Bazaar's Principles. Further more, open source is more and more adopted by global companies. Their projects don't like surprises and are allergic to aggressive commercial behaviors. Anyone who will take a few minutes browsing the web will find a good estimation of the software pricing thanks to the Searches/Social networks/Analysts reports. Why hide something easy to find out? Last and not least, every vendor should be able to justify its pricing and be convinced it is the perfect price. There is no such a (good) thing than a vendor believing into his pricing.

So, buyers, what do you prefer? Are you keen giving an advantage to the vendors not hiding their pricing? Or do you still want to be the next victims of the Bazaar's principles?

Loading mentions Retweet

Filed under // coss open source pricing

2 comments

Jan 14, 2010
ninjaasesino said...
Of course we prefer information to the lack thereof! It gives us the advantage in choosing/bargaining for a product!

There are other factors though, relating to why prices are or are not hidden - in particular the relationships that form between competing vendors of a similar product. For many products, there is no established price. Though it may seem counter-intuitive, this situation may be to the benefit of ALL, or at least the MAJORITY of vendors! If all competing software vendors publish their prices, it makes it easier for consumers to shop around. Given that opportunity - perfect information - it is probable that of 10 alternative products, only one or two will survive within an extended time frame. Maybe one is the high end, high quality product, and one is somewhat cheaper. Regardless, the other 8 are out of business. The solution? Misinformation, or a complete lack of information. No one knows (except maybe the two "best" companies) and everyone gets a chunk of market share.

This is just one scenario which - I admit - may sound somewhat like a conspiracy. Another scenario is PRICE WARS. This is another zero sum game that leads to a fewer number of surviving software providers.

The key point is this: the two factors described above do not exert an overt influence on software providers... there are no secret meetings, and prices are not manipulated by secret monopolies. Rather, because of the reasons I outlined above, in sectors of the software industry where prices DO become known, the result is to eliminate all but a few competitors. Thus, the only software markets with many competitors that CAN exist are ones in which prices are obscured.

But maybe I'm thinking too much about this. Thoughts?

Jan 15, 2010
Tristan Renaud said...
Interesting comments indeed... I don't believe one solution to be the best and I don't believe things are what they are by chance. You may be right, or not, at this time it is a speculation to believe things would be better or worse differently. But I doesn't change the fact that the buyers are remaining in a tough position, when not aware of the pricing before it starts the negotiation.

About price war and pricing transparency, I know industries with high margins and transparent pricing, so I don't see a direct relationship between both.

About market concentration, if pricing transparency leads to (at last) a less fragmented market, I don't believe this to be a disadvantage for the buyers, and for the (remaining) vendors also. From my experience, too much fragmented industries, like content management, is more a pain than anything else for every party.

Leave a comment...

 
To leave a comment on this posterous, please login by clicking one of the following.
Posterous-login     twitter